🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to approve a bill raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a good foundation," commented the European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is largely unfolding at the regional level amid national stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.